Raising Questions on the Potential Pitfalls & Hazards of the Present Avoidance Protocols
1. Hand Sanitizers & Disinfectants
(a) Is it true that overuse of disinfectants increases the mutation rate of microbes which then become resistant to such disinfectants? ... not just resistant to covid 19, but ALL KINDS of microbes that adapt and can become "super pathogens"? Shouldn’t we give this a little more thought before forcing the masses to persist with such avoidance protocols?
(b) Is overuse of hand sanitizer causing many people to develop skin rashes? …and we do we know the long term effects of absorbing those disinfecting chemicals into the skin? The effect of inhaling disinfectant chemical sprayed into the air as per required daily cleaning protocols in many work places?
2. Masks
(a) Has anyone other than State Rep. Nino Vitale actually measured oxygen levels to which those who are required to wear masks are subjected for their entire working day? The video of this simple test was censored off of YouTube but was rescued by former award-winning Chrysler engineer Paul V. Sheridan who posted it to his own website here: http://pvsheridan.com/VitaleTests-oxygen-DANGER_mask.mp4
(b) Has anyone polled or studied those who are forced to wear masks all day to see what impact this is having on their health? I have heard from several who all say they are exhausted by the end of their work day, which makes sense if they are oxygen deprived, doesn’t it?
(c) What are the long-term health consequences of breathing in your own exhale for over 1/3 of a day and working under oxygen deficient conditions? Shouldn’t this be on the table as a matter of concern?
(d) Is anyone suggesting to such individuals who are required to wear masks all day for their jobs to drink ozonated water or use other means to re-oxygenate their bodies to compensate for this forced oxygen deprivation?
(e) Is anyone studying the impact on the immune system from re-breathing one’s own exhale while under oxygen deficient conditions? Does it make sense that this might tax the immune system which is in a more susceptible state due to the lower oxygen levels?
3. Regarding use of both masks & disinfectants
(a) Aren’t our bodies meant to be challenged daily by all manner of germs in the environment in order to maintain a robust immune system? Isn’t prolonged "avoidance" of a rich microbial environment weakening our immune systems and making us MORE susceptible to all manner of illness?
(b) While short term – say a quick trip to the supermarket, or a visit to a loved one in a nursing home – infrequent use of masks and disinfectants may be fine, is anyone considering the public health and safety aspects of prolonged long hours use of these measures?
4. Social Distancing: Is anyone systematically studying and tallying up the adverse psychological effects of social distancing? …particularly for children, teens and young adults?
5. COVID 19 testing: If we tested for vitamin D instead of COVID 19, wouldn’t this make a lot more sense to do? Educate people about how to use vitamin D to strengthen their immune system so that fear of sickness and death from COVID 19 are rendered a moot point? And then would we still need any of these other measures except where the situation around certain vulnerable persons warrant it?
(a) Are we gaining anything by testing for COVID 19 at this point in time? All the efforts to “contact trace” when someone tests positive…what does that mean if someone catches COVID 19 who is vitamin D deficient? What does the data indicate is a likely outcome?
(b) If we focused on improving vitamin D (and nutritional) status rather than tracking down every possibly “infected” person with COVID 19 and having to repeatedly test for COVID 19 with tests that are well documented to be unreliable, wouldn’t we be eliminating the hazard altogether?
A true Health CARE System would focus on improving, not eroding, our health. The present “protective” measures are not really protective at all. They are AVOIDANCE measures. If you catch COVID 19 and you are deficient in vitamin D, the data shows you are likely to get very sick and possibly die. And your chances are worse if you are obese or have darker skin or have another “co-morbidity” for which vitamin D deficiency is an underlying factor.
By the time a vaccine for COVID 19 is ready (assuming it is even possible to create a safe, effective vaccine in light of the fact no one has done it before for coronaviruses – man-made or otherwise), COVID 19 will have many mutations. Unlike the vaccine, vitamin D is protective no matter what the mutation. It’s not the mutation that matters as much as the health of your immune system. At least that is what a very large body of scientific research shows.
Keep in mind that on his deathbed in 1895, Louis Pasteur, the discoverer of vaccines is claimed to have said that he got it all wrong: “The microbe is nothing. The terrain is everything.”
Vitamin D fortifies the terrain.
1. Hand Sanitizers & Disinfectants
(a) Is it true that overuse of disinfectants increases the mutation rate of microbes which then become resistant to such disinfectants? ... not just resistant to covid 19, but ALL KINDS of microbes that adapt and can become "super pathogens"? Shouldn’t we give this a little more thought before forcing the masses to persist with such avoidance protocols?
(b) Is overuse of hand sanitizer causing many people to develop skin rashes? …and we do we know the long term effects of absorbing those disinfecting chemicals into the skin? The effect of inhaling disinfectant chemical sprayed into the air as per required daily cleaning protocols in many work places?
2. Masks
(a) Has anyone other than State Rep. Nino Vitale actually measured oxygen levels to which those who are required to wear masks are subjected for their entire working day? The video of this simple test was censored off of YouTube but was rescued by former award-winning Chrysler engineer Paul V. Sheridan who posted it to his own website here: http://pvsheridan.com/VitaleTests-oxygen-DANGER_mask.mp4
(b) Has anyone polled or studied those who are forced to wear masks all day to see what impact this is having on their health? I have heard from several who all say they are exhausted by the end of their work day, which makes sense if they are oxygen deprived, doesn’t it?
(c) What are the long-term health consequences of breathing in your own exhale for over 1/3 of a day and working under oxygen deficient conditions? Shouldn’t this be on the table as a matter of concern?
(d) Is anyone suggesting to such individuals who are required to wear masks all day for their jobs to drink ozonated water or use other means to re-oxygenate their bodies to compensate for this forced oxygen deprivation?
(e) Is anyone studying the impact on the immune system from re-breathing one’s own exhale while under oxygen deficient conditions? Does it make sense that this might tax the immune system which is in a more susceptible state due to the lower oxygen levels?
3. Regarding use of both masks & disinfectants
(a) Aren’t our bodies meant to be challenged daily by all manner of germs in the environment in order to maintain a robust immune system? Isn’t prolonged "avoidance" of a rich microbial environment weakening our immune systems and making us MORE susceptible to all manner of illness?
(b) While short term – say a quick trip to the supermarket, or a visit to a loved one in a nursing home – infrequent use of masks and disinfectants may be fine, is anyone considering the public health and safety aspects of prolonged long hours use of these measures?
4. Social Distancing: Is anyone systematically studying and tallying up the adverse psychological effects of social distancing? …particularly for children, teens and young adults?
5. COVID 19 testing: If we tested for vitamin D instead of COVID 19, wouldn’t this make a lot more sense to do? Educate people about how to use vitamin D to strengthen their immune system so that fear of sickness and death from COVID 19 are rendered a moot point? And then would we still need any of these other measures except where the situation around certain vulnerable persons warrant it?
(a) Are we gaining anything by testing for COVID 19 at this point in time? All the efforts to “contact trace” when someone tests positive…what does that mean if someone catches COVID 19 who is vitamin D deficient? What does the data indicate is a likely outcome?
(b) If we focused on improving vitamin D (and nutritional) status rather than tracking down every possibly “infected” person with COVID 19 and having to repeatedly test for COVID 19 with tests that are well documented to be unreliable, wouldn’t we be eliminating the hazard altogether?
A true Health CARE System would focus on improving, not eroding, our health. The present “protective” measures are not really protective at all. They are AVOIDANCE measures. If you catch COVID 19 and you are deficient in vitamin D, the data shows you are likely to get very sick and possibly die. And your chances are worse if you are obese or have darker skin or have another “co-morbidity” for which vitamin D deficiency is an underlying factor.
By the time a vaccine for COVID 19 is ready (assuming it is even possible to create a safe, effective vaccine in light of the fact no one has done it before for coronaviruses – man-made or otherwise), COVID 19 will have many mutations. Unlike the vaccine, vitamin D is protective no matter what the mutation. It’s not the mutation that matters as much as the health of your immune system. At least that is what a very large body of scientific research shows.
Keep in mind that on his deathbed in 1895, Louis Pasteur, the discoverer of vaccines is claimed to have said that he got it all wrong: “The microbe is nothing. The terrain is everything.”
Vitamin D fortifies the terrain.
